Email this article Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas terhadap Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan
(1) Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to describe the legal arrangements regarding the Free Verdict according to positive legal provisions, the Judicial role of the Judge in deciding a case and Juridical Analysis of a conviction for a murder crime (Study of Judgment Number 423 / Pid / 2008 PN. South Jakarta. This research method is normative juridical research.The nature of this research is descriptive analysis, which is a method used to describe a condition or condition that is happening or ongoing in order to provide as much data as possible about the object of research so as to explore things that are ideal, then analyzed based on legal theory or applicable laws and regulations.Results of this study, first, the legal arrangements regarding the acquittal according to positive legal provisions is to look at Article 191 Paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code specifically also provides an understanding that reinforces its role law about being free from all lawsuits. Second, the role of judges legally in deciding a case in the decision of Case Decision Number 423 / Pid / 2008 / PN. South Jakarta is a judge must pay attention to the interests of various parties, both the interests of the defendant, witnesses, and the interests of the Public Prosecutor.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ediwarman, (2015) Metode Penelitian Hukum, Softmedia, Medan,
Manan, B (2005) Suatu Tinjauan Terhadap Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun (2004), Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Jakarta,
Marpaung, L (1995). Putusan Bebas Masalah dan Pemecahannya, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,
Marzuki, P.M (2008). Penelitian Hukm, Prenada Kencana Media Grup, Jakarta,
Moeljatno, (1993) Asas-asa Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
Mulyadi, L. (2002). HukumAcra PIdana (Suatu Tinjauan Khusus Terhadap Surat Dakwaan, Eksepsi dan Putusan Peradilan), Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
Mulyadi, L., (2007) Putusan Hakim Dalam Acara Hukum Pidana (Teori dan Praktek, Tenik Penyusunan, dan Permasalahannya), PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
Pasaribu, O.L.H., Iman J., dan Elvi Z.L., (2008), Kajian Yuridis terhadap Putusan Bebas Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan), Mercatoria, 1 (2): 130-140.
Salim HS & Nurbani, E.S (2013) Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Sinaga, D (2015) Kemandirian dan Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Pidana dalam Negara Hukum Pancasila, Nusamedia, Jakarta,
Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta,
Soekanto, S. dan Madmuji, S (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Press, Jakarta,
Sugiyono, (2010) Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung,
Suryabrata, S (1998). Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahu 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Wasit, SP, (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, UMN Press, Malang,
Witanto, D.Y dan Kutawaringin, A.P.N (2013) Diskresi Hakim Sebuah Instrumen Menegakkan Keadilan Substantif dalam Perkara-perkara pidana, Alfabeta, Bandung,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v2i2.100
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License