Tanggung Jawab Notaris atas Pemalsuan yang Dilakukan oleh Klien dalam Proses Pembuatan Akta
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Abstract
Notary is a public official who is authorized to make an authentic deed whose authority has been determined by law, in fact there are not a few notaries who commit violations or crimes in making a deed so as to result in the emergence of criminal acts, it can be seen in the decision of the Padang District Court Number 535 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Pdg, in this case the notary public commits an act of forgery so that the notary is liable to criminal liability against him. This writing aims to review and analyze the legal consequences of the deed which in the process of making that contain elements of forgery and analyze criminal liability against a notary in the Padang District Court's decision No. 535 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Pdg. the results of this paper show that the legal consequences of the deed which in the process of making it contain elements of forgery can be canceled, the cancellation of a deed is a sanction against legal actions that contain elements of juridical defects (causes of cancellation) and also has no legal consequences since the cancellation of parties referred to in the deed. The criminal liability against the notary public in the decision of the Padang District Court Number 535 / Pid.B / 2013 / PN.Pdg, has fulfilled both elements in terms of the ability to be responsible and errors, and the absence of forgiving reasons, all three elements have been fulfilled so that the legal notary as the defendant can be held liable for criminal action against him.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Tapsir Tematik Terhadap UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Bandung, Refika Aditama.
Ali, M, (2015), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Andrisman, T, (2007), Hukum Pidana, Bandar Lampung, Universitas Lampung.
Din, T. (2019), Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Terindikasi Pidana. Kupang, Jurnal Penelitian hukum DE JURE. Vol. 19 No. 2. Juni 2019.
Hamdan, M, (2008), Pembaharuan Hukum Tentang Alasan Penghapusan Pidana, Medan, Pustaka Bangsa Press.
Kanter, E.Y. & Sianturi, S.R. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika.
Kanter, E.Y. & Sianturi, S.R. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Lubis, S, (1994), Etika Profesi Hukum, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno, (1993), Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Bina Aksara.
Ningsi, Faisal, Adwani, (2019), Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Mediator Sengketa Kenotariatan Terkait denganKewajiban Penyuluhan Hukum, JIKH Vol. 13 No. 2 Juli 2019, Banda Aceh
Oloan, N, (2016), Praktek Pembuatan Akta Tanah oleh Camat dalam Kedudukan dan Fungsinya Selaku PPAT Sementara di Kota Padangsidimpuan, Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 8 (2) (2016): 123-131
Putri A.R. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Indikator Tugas-Tugas Jabatan Notaris Yang Berimplikasi Perbuatan Pidana. Jakarta: Sofmedia.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Putusan Nomor 535/Pid.B/2013/PN.Pdg
Santoso, A. (2012). Hukum, Moral, Dan Keadilan: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Santoso, J. (2003), Tanggunggugat Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Keterangan Waris, Universitas Air Langga, Surabaya
Sunggono, B. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notararis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v2i3.129
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License