Dinamika Peran dan Strategi LSM dalam Politik Lingkungan Hidup: Kasus Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan

Hamzah Jamaludin(1), Wijayanto Wijayanto(2), Supratiwi Supratiwi(3),


(1) Universitas Diponegoro
(2) Universitas Diponegoro
(3) Universitas Diponegoro

Abstract


Protection non-administrative associations (NGOs) and firms have been advancing worldwide willful principles, for example, the Roundtable on Supportable Palm Oil (RSPO), to create naturally dependable merchandise in tropical nations. This examination tries to figure out the methodologies and the viability of preservation NGOs concerning the RSPO. Our examination records that the preservation NGOs, while drawing in with the RSPO, might be separated into four classifications in view of the sort of assets prepared and the protection objectives: 1) 'Cooperative NGOs' try to change the framework from inside by giving logical exploration based data, by standing firm on essential situations and by making rules; 2) 'Rival' stays outside the RSPO while involving it as a stage for public missions; 3) 'Doubter' upholds networks to get neighborhood land privileges. These NGOs have carried out techniques that fortified RSPO's foundation. Be that as it may, the organization of the RSPO keeps the NGOs from arriving at their objectives for three reasons: 1) individual NGOs can't change system; 2) NGOs utilizing different commitment procedures can't team up; and 3) the doubter NGOs are basically rejected from the RSPO, however nearby land freedoms are a principal matter of worry for biodiversity protection. NGOs would be more successful in arriving at their objectives either by focussing on their underlying preservation goals or by decisively teaming up with one another external the designs of the RSPO.


Keywords


Role Dynamics; NGO Strategy; Environmental Politics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agus, F., I.E. Henson, B.H. Sahardjo, N. Harris, M. van Noordwijk, dan T.J. (2013). Tinjauan faktor emisi untuk penilaian emisi CO2 dari perubahan penggunaan lahan menjadi kelapa sawit di Asia Tenggara. Dalam: Laporan dari Panel Teknis Kelompok Kerja GRK RSPO Kedua (eds. Killeen, T.J., dan J. Goon). hal. 7-31. Kuala Lumpur: RSPO.

Barker, M. (2009). Ketika Lingkungan Melegitimasi Penjarahan. Komentar Angsa 15, http://www.swans.com/library/art15/barker12.html. Diakses pada Juni 2022.

Cheyns, E. (2012). (Dé) politisation des standards dans les dispositifs de normalisation multiparties prenantes. Les cas du soja et de l’huile de palme. In: Normaliser au nom du développement durable (eds. Alphandréry, P., M. Djama, and A. Fortier). Pp.101-118. Versailles: Quae

Cheyns, E. (2014). Making “minority voices†head in transnational round tables: the role of NGOs in reintroducing justice and attachments. Agriculture and Human Values 31(3): 439-453

Cholchester, M. and S. Chao. (2014). Revising the RSPO guide on free, prior and informed consent. Conclusions and questions. RT12. Moreton-inMarsh: Forest Peoples Programme.

Friedberg, E. (1991). Le pouvoir et la règle. Dynamiques de l’action organisée. Paris: Seuil

Gautier, D. and T. Benjaminsen. (2012). Introduction à la political ecology. In: Environnement, discours et pouvoir. L’approche Political Ecology. (eds. Gautier, D. and T. Benjaminsen). Pp. 5-20. Versailles: Quae

Hooijer, A., M. Silvius, H. Wösten, and S. Page. (2006). PEAT-CO2: assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in SE Asia. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft Hydraulics. http://www.stockandland.com.au/news/ agriculture/agribusiness/general-news/adm-ups-wilmar-stake/2719170. aspx 09. Diakses pada tanggal 9 Juni 2022

Jiwan, N. (2013). The political ecology of the Indonesia palm oil industry, a critical analysis. Pp. 48-75. In: The palm oil controversy in South East Asia. A transnational perspective. (eds. Pye, O. and J. Bhattacharya). Pp. 48-75. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies

McCarthy, J. (2012). Certifying in contested spaces: private regulation in Indonesian forestry and palm oil. Third World Quarterly 33(10): 1871-1888

Miettinen, J., A. Hooijer, S. Chenghua, D. Tollenaar, R. Vernimmen, S. Chin Liew, C. Mallins, and S. Page. (2012). Extent of industrial plantations on Southeast Asian peatlands in 2010 with analysis of historical expansion and future projections. GCB Bioenergy doi: 10.1111/j.1757- 1707.2012.01172.x

Muzaki, A. (2021). Pengendalian Kebakaran Hutan Melalui Penguatan Peran Polisi Kehutanan Untuk Mewujudkan Sustainable Development Goals. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, dan Agraria 23(1)

Parker, D. (2013). Palm oil workers stage massive protest at sustainability meeting in Indonesia. November 19. Mongabay. http://news.mongabay. com/2013/1119-dparker-palm-oil-worker-protest.html. Diakses pada tanggal 6 Juni 2022

Peluso, N. (2012). Situer les political écologies: l’exemple du caoutchouc. In: Environnement, discours et pouvoir. L’approche Political Ecology. (eds. Gautier, D. and T. Benjaminsen). Pp. 37-65. Versailles: Quae

Persey, S., R. Nussbaum, M. Hatchwell, S. Christie, and H. Crowley. (2011). Towards sustainable palm oil: a framework for action. Cambridge: ZSL/Proforest/WCS

Rakhman, A. (2020). Dinamika Peran Ngo Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Arena Politik Lokal Di Provinsi Jambi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 4(4).

Ruysschaert, D. and D. Salles. (2014). Towards global voluntary standards: Questioning the effectiveness in attaining conservation goals. The case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil (RSPO). Ecological Economics 107: 438-446

Ruysschaert, D., A. Darsoyo, R. Zen, G. Gea, and I. Singleton. (2011). Developing palm-oil production on degraded land. Medan: PanEco, YEL and World Agroforestry Centre

Struebig, M., T. Kingston, E. Petit, S. Le Comber, A. Zubaid, A. Mohd-Adnan, and S. Rossiter. (2011). Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments. Ecology Letters 14(6): 582-590




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i1.1318

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License