Dampak Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai terhadap Konsumsi Makanan dan Rokok pada Rumah Tangga Miskin di Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i2.1407
Nina Istriawati(1), Teguh Dartanto(2),


(1) Universitas Indonesia
(2) Universitas Indonesia

Abstract


This article aimed to determine the extent to which the BPNT program affects food consumption, nutritional intake, and cigarettes in poor households in Indonesia. The problem was focused on comparing the impact of social assistance in the form of in kind, e-vouchers, and cash transfers on changes in consumption of calories, protein, fat and carbohydrates in poor households receiving assistance. Some Researches in a number of countries showed that in-kind assistance is able to have the greatest impact on increasing the beneficiary's calorie consumption compared to cash transfers. This research was analyzed quantitatively using a quasi-experimental design approach with the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis method. Sources of data came from secondary data from the National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas) Quarter I (March) of the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) 2018, in the form of the consumption/expenditure module (KP), and the Susenas of basic information on household members (KOR). The result showed that BPNT contributes to an increase in the fat consumption of beneficiary households. The biggest increase occurred in the BPNT PKH complementary program, not only in fat consumption, but also in protein. BPNT also contributed to the increase in cigarette consumption among households in the non-PKH and PKH program group, while in the PIP program group, showed the opposite result.

Keywords


Non-Cash Food Assistance; In Kind; Cash Transfer; Propensity Score Matching.

Full Text:

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i2.1407

References


Aker, J. C. (2017). Comparing cash and voucher transfers in a humanitarian context: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo. World Bank Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv055

Soerojo, W., dkk. (2020). Fakta Tembakau Indonesia 2020: Data Empirik untuk Pengendalian Tembakau. Jakarta: Ikatan Ahli Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia.

Baser, O. (2006). Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value in Health, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00130.x

Beatty, T. K. M., & Tuttle, C. J. (2015). Expenditure response to increases in in-kind transfers: Evidence from the supplemental nutrition assistance program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau097

Brookhart, M. A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K. J., Glynn, R. J., Avorn, J., & Stürmer, T. (2006). Variable selection for propensity score models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(12). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj149

Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x

Chun, D., Chung, Y., Woo, C., Seo, H., & Ko, H. (2015). Labor union effects on innovation and commercialization productivity: An integrated propensity score matching and two-stage data envelopment analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055120

Cunha, J. M. (2014). Testing paternalism: Cash versus in-kind transfers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.2.195

Currie, J., & Gahvari, F. (2008). Transfers in cash and in-kind: Theory meets the data. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.2.333

Dartanto, T., Moeis, F. R., Can, C. K., Ratih, S. P., Nurhasana, R., Satrya, A., & Thabrany, H. (2021). Good intentions, unintended outcomes: Impact of social assistance on tobacco consumption in Indonesia. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 19. https://doi.org/10.18332/TID/132966

Doocy, S., & Tappis, H. (2017). Cashâ€based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.17

Doocy, S., & Tappis, H. (2017). The effectiveness and efficiency of cash-based approaches in emergencies. Campbell Collaboration.

Doocy, S., Busingye, M., Lyles, E., Colantouni, E., Aidam, B., Ebulu, G., & Savage, K. (2020). Cash and voucher assistance and children’s nutrition status in Somalia. Maternal and Child Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12966

Dwiputri, I. N. (2017). The Impact of The Unconditional Cash Transfer Program (BLT) On Cigarette Consumption in Indonesian Society. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.22430

Gentilini, U. (2016). The Revival of the “Cash versus Food†Debate: New Evidence for an Old Quandary? Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7584. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7584

Gilligan, D. & S. Roy. (2013). Resource, stimulation, and cognition: How transfer programs and preschool shape cognitive development in Uganda. Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economic Association’s 2013 AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 4 – 6 Agustus

Harris, H., & Horst, S. J. (2016). A brief guide to decisions at each step of the propensity score matching process. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 21(4).

Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data. Econometrica, 66(5). https://doi.org/10.2307/2999630

Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Peterman, A., Margolies, A., & Moreira, V. (2013). Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. Journal of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009

Hidrobo, M., Peterman, A., & Heise, L. (2016). The Effect of Cash, Vouchers, and Food Transfers on Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Northern Ecuador. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2016, 8(3): 284–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.20150048

Hoynes, H. W., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2009). Consumption responses to in-kind transfers: Evidence from the introduction of the food stamp program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.4.109

Ibnu, M., & Rio T.P. (2016). Dampak Ekonomi Sertifikasi 4C: Analisis Propensity Score Matching Petani Kopi Robusta Lampung Barat Dan Tanggamus. Tesis. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Lampung

Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G.B., & Hussain A.S. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. The World Bank

Lusk, J. L., & Weaver, A. (2017). An experiment on cash and in-kind transfers with application to food assistance programs. Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.02.005

Michelson, H. C., Lentz, E., Mulwa, R., Morey, M., Cramer, L., McGlinchy, M. E., & Barrett, C. B. (2012). Cash, Food or Vouchers in Urban and Rural Kenya? An Application of the Market Information and Food Insecurity Response Analysis Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1844594

Pahlevi, S. M., dkk. (2020). Reformasi Pengelolaan Data Terpadu Kesejahteraan Sosial. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi Kesejahteraan Sosial Kementrian Sosial Republik Indonesia.

Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2019 tentang Angka Kecukupan Gizi yang dianjurkan untuk Masyarakat Indonesia. Diakses tanggal 6 Januari 2021 dari http://hukor.kemkes.go.id/uploads/produk_hukum/PMK_No__28_Th_2019_ttg_Angka_Kecukupan_Gizi_Yang_Dianjurkan_Untuk_Masyarakat_Indonesia.pdf

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942

Roy, A. D. (1951). Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041827

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350

Schwab, B. (2020). In the Form of Bread? A Randomized Comparison of Cash and Food Transfers in Yemen. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 102(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaz048

Stuart, E. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2008). Matching with multiple control groups with adjustment for group differences. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998607306078

Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (September, 2018). Program Bantuan Pemerintah Untuk Individu, Keluarga, dan Kelompok Tidak Mampu Menuju Bantuan Sosial Terintegrasi. Jakarta: TNP2K.

Young-Hoon, K. N. (2012). A longitudinal study on the impact of income change and poverty on smoking cessation. Canadian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03403811

Sulaiman, A. A., dkk (2018). Transformasi Bantuan Pangan. Jakarta: IAARD Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i2.1407

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License