Efforts to Reform State Civil Apparatus Management in the Face of Globalization

Beltahmamero Simamora(1),


(1) Universitas Medan Area

Abstract


Currently, Indonesia's institutional structure is overweight with 34 ministries, 28 non-ministerial government institutions, and around 69 non-structural institutions with overlapping authority, indicating the complexity of government fragmentation in Indonesia. Globalization will intervene more in the field of government institutional restructuring when Indonesia's institutional situation is too hierarchical, fragmented, and over-procedural. This paper aims to discuss the importance of ASN management and how the government steps to actualize public values in ASN reform. This research uses a qualitative approach, which describes the efforts to reform ASN management in the face of globalization. The data collection technique used in this research is a literature study by collecting materials from books, journals, by describing the data through several experts' opinions. This paper proposes a recommendation that institutional downsizing is a logical consequence of the fragmented condition of Indonesian government institutions, the president should dare to reorganize the power structure in order to save the cost of governance. The quality of ASN in the face of globalization should be strengthened by recruiting younger employees who understand the dynamics of technological development, and educating ASN personnel by conducting special trainings in responding to globalization as a challenge that must be faced.


Keywords


Reform; Management; State Civil Apparatus; Globalization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ateh, M. Y. (2018). Peran Sakip Dalam Membangun ASN Berkinerja (Studi Kasus Provinsi Jawa Timur). Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Sipil Negara, 5-21.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Administrasi Publik: Desentralisasi, Kelembagaan dan Aparatur Sipil . Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and Public Administration. JSTOR Collection, 509-522.

Moore, M. H. (1995). Defining Public Value: In Creating Public Value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press .

O’Flynn, J. (2007). From New Public Management to Public Value: paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 353 – 366.

Pesch, U. (2008). The Publicness of Public Administration. Journal Administration & Society, 170 – 193.

Pramusinto, A. (2009). Governance Reform di Indonesia: Mencari Arah Kelembagaan Politik yang Demokratis dan Birokrasi yang Profesional. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Purwanto, E. A. (2006). Kepemimpinan Transformasional untuk Reformasi Birokrasi. Jurnal Politik dan Manajemen, 111 – 118.

Radhika, D. (2012). Ethics in Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Reseach, 23-31.

Spano, A. (2009). Public Value Creation and Management Control Systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 328 – 348.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&B. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Thoha, M. (2014). Birokrasi Politik & Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Zauhar, S. (2012). Reformasi Administrasi: Konsep, Dimensi, dan Strategi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i4.1668

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License