Aspects of Arbitral Awards in the Indonesian Justice System: Historical and Theoretical Review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1780
Azwir Agus(1),


(1) Universitas Medan Area

Abstract


This study aims to analyze aspects of arbitral awards in the Indonesian justice system from historical and theoretical perspectives. The Arbitration Law confirms that arbitral awards have the same legal force as court decisions. The method used in this research is normative legal method. This legal method focuses on the analysis of existing legal norms, including statutory regulations, court decisions, legal principles, and other legal documents in this context, namely, aspects of arbitral awards in the Indonesian justice system. The results of the study show that the implementation of the arbitral award by the parties must be seen as a consequence of choosing arbitration to resolve the dispute, it is the parties who choose their own judges, even for their choice of law, then the implementation of the arbitral award is consciously a necessity of the parties themselves. Arbitration awards can be annulled in the justice system in Indonesia as a form of protection for justice and legal order. Grounds for annulment of an arbitral award, as provided for in the Arbitration Act, may include a breach of procedure, the incompetence of the arbitrator, or an award that violates decency or public decency. Arbitration awards are an important tool in the dispute resolution system in Indonesia, especially in the business and investment sphere.

Keywords


Arbitration Decisions; Indonesian Courts; Legal Dispute Resolution; Legal Certainty

Full Text:

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1780

References


Adiasih, N., & Simanjuntak, S. L. (2023). Non-Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Award in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 3rd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2021 (BIS-HSS 2021) (pp. 981–987). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_164

Ali, Z. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum (1st ed.). Sinar Grafika Offset.

Chan, E. H. W., & Suen, H. C. H. (2005). Dispute resolution management for international construction projects in China. Management Decision, 43(4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510593576

Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Damian, E., & Hornick, R. N. (1972). Indonesia’s Formal Legal System: An Introduction. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 20(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.2307/839317

Fikri, A., & Hasudungan, A. N. (2022). The Nasionalisasi-Investasi Perusahaan Asing, Mafia Berkeley dan Berakhirnya Rezim Presiden Soekarno. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 5(2), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.30872/yupa.v5i2.784

Hansen, S. (2019). Challenging Arbitral Awards in the Construction Industry: Case Study of Infrastructure Disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000281

Harmon, K. M. J. (2003). Resolution of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3(4), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)

Hasbi, M. Z. N., Sari, S. W. H. P., Widayanti, I., & Rahmayati, A. (2022). MaqÄá¹£id Al-Sharī’ah and Development of Contemporary Sharia Arbitration Doctrine as an Alternative for Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution. International Conference on Law, Technology, Spirituality and Society (ICOLESS), 1–11. http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/ICOLESS/article/view/1834

Hasyim, A. D. (2021). Extra-Judicial Dispute Resolution and the Realization of Justice in the Indonesia Legal System. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 55(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v55i1.305

Jamal, M., Mahfudz, A. A., Syamsuri, S., & Handayani, R. (2021). Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution in non-litigation dispute resolution on Islamic Mortgage: at the Ombudsman Institution Yogyakarta. TSAQAFAH, 17(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v17i1.6760

Karel, G., Bus, C. Du, Prins, D., Resident, D., War, J., & Vii, C. (2008). Chapter I. The south-central Javanese world Circa 1792-1825. In The Power of Prophecy (pp. 1–68). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789067183031_002

Karmel, C. J., & Yunanto, Y. (2022). Urgensi Pengaturan Pelaksanaan Cyber Notary Terkait Dengan Pandemi Covid-19. Notarius, 15(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46022

Kasim, A. (2021). THE SETTLEMENT OF SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC CLASSIC TRADITIONS AND POSITIVE LAW. Tasharruf: Journal Economics and Business of Islam, 6(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.30984/tjebi.v6i1.1414

Kesuma, D. A., & Triputra, Y. A. (2020). Urgency of Consumer Legal Protection and E-Commerce Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration in the Asian Market. Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.182

Liâ€Hua, R., & Khalil, T. M. (2006). Technology management in China: a global perspective and challenging issues. Journal of Technology Management in China, 1(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770610642731

Mills, K. (2002). Judicial Attitudes to Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and other Judicial Involvement in Arbitration in Indonesia. Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 106–119. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=Journals%5CAMDM%5CAMDM2002019.pdf

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Noel, B. R., Shoemake, A. T., & Hale, C. L. (2006). Conflict resolution in a non-Western context: Conversations with Indonesian scholars and practitioners. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.148

Price, D. (2017). Indonesia’s Bold Strategy on Bilateral Investment Treaties: Seeking an Equitable Climate for Investment? Asian Journal of International Law, 7(1), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251315000247

Shavell, S. (1995). Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Economic Analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/467950

Stipanowich, T. J. (2004). ADR and the “Vanishing Trialâ€: The Growth and Impact of “Alternative Dispute Resolution.†Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(3), 843–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00025.x

Suadi, A. (2018). Preference of Non-litigation Procedures through Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes. Lex Publica, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.5.2.2018.1-12

Walde, T. W. (2008). Renegotiating acquired rights in the oil and gas industries: Industry and political cycles meet the rule of law. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 1(1), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwn005




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1780

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License