Penegakan Hukum Persidangan Cepat Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas (Studi Satlantas Polrestabes Medan)
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
(4) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
(5) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Abstract
Procedures for handling cases of traffic violations in Indonesia are regulated by Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transport (LLAJ Law) which is a substitute for Act Number 14 of 1992 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation and Law Number 8 Year 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. In addition, there are several derivative regulations that complement the provisions in the Act. Traffic violations in the Criminal Procedure Act (KUHAP) are grouped together with minor criminal offenses to follow the procedure for examining fast events. The method in this research is empirical juridical legal research type, which is a study that conducts a study of research in the field, conducted a direct research (risearch) regarding the enforcement of court proceedings quickly in the settlement of traffic violation cases. This research uses a qualitative approach. Based on the research, it was found that there were several obstacles in enforcing fast trial law in the settlement of traffic violations, among others: First, the number of traffic violations in Medan City which made the Judges who heard would be overwhelmed, coupled with less extensive room facilities or inadequate infrastructure facilities. which will make the room will be filled with traffic violators who will sit in the courtroom. Second, in the trial process of fast events there are still many traffic violators who use brokers in their law enforcement processes, because the crowds of court officials sometimes find it difficult to distinguish which brokers often play in the maintenance of the law enforcement process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Christine S.T. Kansil, C.S.T Kansil. (2002). Hukum dan Tata Negara Republik Indonesia Cetakan Ketiga. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. halaman 90.
Dahlan, M., dan Marlina, (2013), Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Putusan di Pengadilan Negeri Sigli), Mercatoria, 6 (1): 104-116
Harahap M.Y. (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Cetakan ke 12. Sinar Grafika.
Mahrus, A. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno, (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rieneka Cipta
Rusli. M. (2013). Lembaga Pengadilan Indonesia Beserta Putusan Kontroversial, UII Pres, Yongyakarta.
Samapto, S.A., (2009). Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Luar Pengadilan Terhadap Dugaan Kejahatan Pasal 359 KUHP Dalam Perkara Lalu Lintas, STMIK AMIKOM. Yongyakarta.
Siregar, R.D.W, Mubarak, R & Zulyadi, R. (2019). Peranan Kepolisian Dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Wilayah Polsek Deli Tua (Studi Kasus Polsek Delitua). JUNCTO, 1(2) 2019: 150-157,
Soekanto, S. (1989). Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Masalah-masalah Sosial, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti. Halaman 58
Yudianto, E., Marlina, dan Arif, (2010), Peran Kepolisian Republik Indonesia dalam Sosialisasi Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (Studi pada Markas Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara), Mercatoria, 3 (1): 20 – 33.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 1992 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan, sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 22 tahun 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i1.197
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License