Hubungan Gaya Kepemimpinan Transaksional dengan Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan PT. Socfindo Aek Pamingke Divisi V

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i1.2306
Rahma Afwina(1), Muhammad Al Fiqri(2),


(1) Universitas Medan Area
(2) Universitas Medan Area

Abstract


The aim of this study is to investigated the correlational between transactional leadership style and job satisfaction of employees PT. Socfindo Aek Pamingke Division V. The approach used to this study is quantitative research. The study participants were 81 of employees at Division V. They were selected making use of purposive sampling that is the sample were taken based on their characteristics, namely employees of PT. Socfindo Aek Pamingke Division V, under 50 years, work range 5 years and above. The hypothesis in this study was a positive correlational between transactional leadership style and job satisfaction of PT. Socfindo Aek Pamingke Division V employeesâ€. Assuming that the more effective the transactional leadership style is, the higher the employee's job satisfaction. Conversely, the less effective the transactional leadership style, the lower employee job satisfaction. Data collection uses a Likert scale, where alternative answers consist of four categories. The assessment given to each subject's answer to each favorable statement is Strongly Agree (SS) with a value of 4, Agree (S) with a value of 3, Disagree (TS) with a value of 2, Strongly Disagree (STS) with a value of 1. The unfavorable statements are Strongly Agree (SS) with a value of 1, Agree (S) with a value of 2, Disagree with a value of 3, strongly disagree (STS) with a value of 4. Based on data analysis, the coefficient rxy = 0.673. With a significance value of P < 0.000. Shows that the transactional leadership style contributes to job satisfaction of 45.3%. So, there is a positive relationship between transactional leadership style and employee job satisfaction. From the results obtained, it can be stated that the proposed hypothesis is accepted.

Keywords


Transactional Leadership Style; Job Satisfaction; Employee

Full Text:

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i1.2306

References


Aamodt, M., G. (2010). Industrial/Organizational Psychology (6th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Adamy, M. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Unimal Press.

Agustini, F. (2019). Strategi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. UISU Press.

Aruan, Q. S., & Fakhri, M. (2015). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Lapangan Departemen Grasberg Power Distribution Pt. Freeport Indonesia. MODUS, 27(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.24002/modus.v27i2.553

Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., & Novitasari, D. (2022). Kepuasan Kerja Guru Di antara Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Transaksional. Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif (Jupetra), 1(1), 7–12.

Budiwibowo, S. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transaksional, Transformasional Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru (Karyawan) Di Kota Madiun. Premiere Educandum, 4(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v4i02.312

Burhanuddin, B., & Kurniawan, A. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transaksional dan Transformasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bank BRI Purworejo. Coopetition: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.32670/coopetition.v11i1.58

Fortuna, Y. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pusat pendidikan komputer akuntansi inter nusa dua di Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.37721/je.v18i3.7

Hutahaean, W. S. (2021). TEORI KEPEMIMPINAN. Ahlimedia Press.

Indriana, S. C., & Baharuddin, F. (2015). Hubungan Gaya Kepemimpinan Transaksional Dengan Kepuasan Kerja di Perusahaan Konsultan Arsitek Surabaya. Jurnal Psikologi Humanistik 45, 3(2).

Javed, H. A., Javari, A. A., & Rahim, M. (2014). Leadership style and employees’ job satisfaction A case from the private Banking sector of Pakistan. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(3), 41–50.

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Nazim, F. (2016). Principals’ Transformational and Transactional Leadership Style and Job Satisfaction of College Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 18–22. https://doi.org/2222-1735 (Paper); 2222-288X (Online)

Rachman, A., Yochanan, E., Samanlangi, A. I., & Purnomo, H. (2024). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF KUALITATIF DAN R & D (1st ed.). CV. Saba Jaya Publisher.

Riggio, R., E. (2018). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology (7th ed.). Routledge.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2012). Organizational Behavior (15th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Siswanti, Y. (2015). Meraih Kesuksesan Organisasi Dengan Kepemimpinan Manajerial Yang Smart Dengan Pendekatan Riset Empiris.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Yukl, G., & Gardner, W., L. (2020). Leadership In Organizations (9th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i1.2306

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License