Kontribusi Advokat dalam Urgensi Pelaksanaan Mediasi dalam Perkara Pidana

Topan Billers Aritonang(1), Martono Anggusti(2), Yosua Tahyudi Panjaitan(3),


(1) Universitas HKBP Nommensen
(2) Universitas HKBP Nommensen
(3) Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Abstract


The active role of advocates in peace efforts is stated in the Indonesian Advocate Code of Ethics (KEAI). This is the role that the author wants to emphasize in the contribution of advocates in the urgency of implementing mediation in criminal cases. With the active involvement of advocates, the peace process which previously only took place in the mediation room can now expand outside the mediation room, through interactions carried out by each legal representative. This article uses normative and qualitative juridical research methods on previous data about lawyers, as well as the results of observations and insights obtained by the author while carrying out internship activities at a law office. The results of this research found that the role of advocates is also important as a catalyst for peace between victims and perpetrators of criminal acts. Advocates act as mediators whose aim is to reach an agreement on compensation for the victim as well as an apology from the perpetrator to the victim as well as a form of accountability from the perpetrator to the victim. If there is peace through agreed mediation, the legal process can be stopped if the reporter (victim) has withdrawn his report to the police (article 75 of the Criminal Code). Ordinary offenses cannot stop the court process. However, in practice, if this occurs during the court process, the agreement between the perpetrator and the victim or the defendant and the victim witness will be a consideration for the judge in mitigating when handing down a decision.


Keywords


Role of Advocates; Mediation; Criminal Cases.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angrayni, L. (2016). Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Ringan Perspektif Restorative Justice. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 16(1), 88–102.

Armen, A., Aprima, F., Marpaung, R., & Saragih, G. M. (2023). Penegak Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia (Studi Terhadap Advokat, Kepolisian, Kejaksaan Dan Hakim). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(2), 2911–2920.

Cahyani, F., Junaidi, M., Arifin, Z., & Sukarna, K. (2021). Kedudukan Hak Imunitas Advokat Di Indonesia. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 4(1), 146–160.

Fadillah, F. A., & Putri, S. A. (2021). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dan Arbitrase (Literature Review Etika). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(6), 744–756.

Ginting, G. G. P., Asiah, N., & Putri, S. E. (2024). Optimalisasi Pelayanan Hukum Di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama: Studi Kasus Implementasi Prosedur Dan Penyelesaian Perkara Keluarga Di Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Disiplin Ilmu (JPMASDI), 2(2), 163–168.

Hariyono, T. (2021). Mediasi Penal sebagai Alternatif Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(1), 1–18.

Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I., Johnny Ibrahim, S. H., & Se, M. M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media.

Kbbi, K. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Budaya.

Lubis, A. (2016). Peran Advokat dalam Penegakan Hukum di Organisasi Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia Cabang Medan. JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA), 2(2), 176–192. http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jppuma

Nababan, R. D. (2023). Urgensi Penerapan Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 32(1), 74–87.

Natakharisma, K., & Suantra, I. N. (2013). Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Kertha Wicara.

Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 319–330.

Putra, A. W., & Aryaputra, M. I. (2024). Peran Advokat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana melalui Restorative justice. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8027–8034.

Rangkuti, R. A., & Nadhirah, I. (2023). Optimalisasi Peran Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial di Dinas Tenaga Kerja Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 5(3), 2139–2148. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i3.1618

Sidharta, B. A. (2015). Etika dan Kode Etik Profesi Hukum. Veritas et Justitia, 1(1).

Syarifuddin, S., & Nadhirah, I. (2023). Peran Mediator Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan Dan Perlindungan Anak Provinsi Sumatera Utara Dalam Penyelesaian Diskriminasi Dan Penelantaran Anak Akibat Perceraian Orangtua. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 5(3), 2129–2138. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i3.1598

Widyari, D. P. (2024). Efisiensi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Jalur Mediasi Perdata. SYARIAH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 335–341.

Yanti, A. D., & Yusuf, H. (2024). ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIK ANTARA PASIEN DAN DOKTER MELALUI JALUR MEDIASI. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), 4877–4886.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i2.2421

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License