Email this article Critical of the Use of Constitutional Court Decisions by Constitutional Enforcers and Political Tools by the Power Elite
(1) Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to critically analyze the position and role of the Indonesian Constitutional Court (MK) in maintaining constitutional supremacy amidst the dynamics of national politics. The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the use of Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesian constitutional practice, by examining the shift in the function of decisions from an instrument for enforcing the constitution to a tool for political legitimacy by the power elite. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with document analysis methods, in-depth interviews with constitutional law experts, and critical reviews of MK decisions considered to be politically charged. The results of the study indicate that there is a tendency for the power elite to utilize MK decisions as an instrument of political legitimacy. The contributing factors include the judge recruitment process that is still strongly influenced by political nuances, weak internal ethical mechanisms, and external pressures from the dynamics of executive and legislative power. The novelty of this study lies in its critical-interdisciplinary approach that examines Constitutional Court decisions not only as normative legal products, but also as political instruments mobilized by the power elite. This study emphasizes that the independence of the MK is the main foundation of a democratic rule of law. Therefore, institutional reform and strengthening of constitutional judicial ethics are needed so that the Constitutional Court does not get caught up in the vortex of practical political interests, but instead consistently becomes the guardian of the constitution and protector of constitutional justice for all Indonesian people.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Regarding the Law in Indonesia. Jakarta: Constitution Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2023). "Constitutional Anomalies in Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023." Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal, 12(2), 101–118.
Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2013). Law and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Black, H. (1962). Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Böckenförde, E. W. (2017). Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). The Constitution of Indonesia: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Compass. (2023, October 18). The Constitutional Court's decision on the Presidential Election Age Limit is considered to be full of political interests.
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945.
Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Diamond, L. (2019). Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacency. New York: Penguin Press.
Dicey, A. V. (1982). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan.
Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (2000). The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Ferejohn, J. (2002). "Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law." Law and Contemporary Problems, 65(3), 41–68.
Ferejohn, J. (2020). Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law. Law and Social Inquiry, 45(2), 495–509.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ginsburg, T., & Huq, A. Z. (2018). How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Huda, N. (2020). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Huda, N. (2020). Indonesian Constitutional Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Huda, N. (2021). The Crisis of Trust in the Constitutional Court: A Legal Political Perspective. Journal of Constitution, 18(4), 623–645.
Kelsen, H. (2006). Pure Theory of Law. New York: The Lawbook Exchange.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
Mahfud MD. (2010). Legal Politics in Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Mahfud MD. (2011). Building Legal Politics, Enforcing the Constitution. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Mahfud MD. (2013). Constitutional Law Debate After Constitutional Amendment. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Montesquieu. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws (A. Cohler, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1748).
Nazir, M. (2011). Research Methods. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper & Row.
Nurhadi. (2018). Selection of Constitutional Judges and Political Intervention in Indonesia. Journal of Law IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(2), 198–216.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Law and Society. Bandung: Angkasa.
Siregar, B. (2024). "Judicial Activism and Legal Politics of the Constitutional Court Decision 90/PUU-XXI/2023." Journal of Constitution and Democracy, 15(1), 33–49.
Situmorang, D. (2020). Judicial Politics in the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Presidential Threshold. Journal of Constitution and Democracy, 15(2), 211–230.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Normative Law Research: A Brief Overview. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Soemitro, R. H. (1998). Legal Research Methodology and Jurimetry. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Strong, C. F. (1972). Modern Political Constitutions: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Their History and Existing Form. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
Tate, C. N., & Vallinder, T. (1995). The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v8i3.3002
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License