Email this article Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penggabungan Dan Pemisahan Perkara Pidana Dalam Surat Dakwaan Penuntut Umum
(1) Universitas Prima Indonesia
(2) Universitas Prima Indonesia
(3) Universitas Prima Indonesia
(4) Universitas Prima Indonesia
(5) Universitas Prima Indonesia
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the consideration of the public prosecutor in merging and separating indictments for several criminal cases and to find out the obstacles of the public prosecutor in merging and separating indictments against several criminal cases. The research used is normative juridical research. With secondary research methods, namely secondary legal materials, which consist of books and articles related to research (both in the form of newspapers, magazines, journals, and other writings). The data obtained are then analyzed qualitatively by describing and describing the data and facts resulting from a research in the field with an interpretation, evaluation, and general knowledge. In the results of this study, the merger of indictments against several criminal cases is Article 141 of the Criminal Procedure Code which reads: "Public prosecutors can merge cases and make them into one indictment". Meanwhile, for the separation of the indictment, there is Article 142 of the Criminal Procedure Code which reads: "In the event that the Public Prosecutor receives a case file containing several criminal acts committed by several suspects which are not included in the provisions of Article 141"
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buana, M.P.F., (2016). Pemisahan Berkas Perkara Pidana (Splitsing) Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Proses Pembuktian Suatu Tindak Pidana Dengan Delik Penyertaan (Studi Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Ambarawa)
Djamali, A, (2010). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y., (2015). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hadiyanto, A. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Fungsi Surat Dakwaan Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Di Pengadilan (Vide Putusan Perkara Pidana Nomor: 274/PID.B/2010/PN.BTM. PETITA, Vol 3 No. 2.
Harahap, M. Y. (2012). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hertanto, H. (2020). Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia.
Marpaung, L. (2009). Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Marpaung, L. (2009). Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rompas, C. (2016). Pemecahan Perkara Pidana (Splitsing) Sebagai Upaya untuk Mempercepat Proses Pembuktian, Lex Privatum, Volume IV No. 2.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supramono, G. (1998). Surat Dakwaan dan Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Djambatan
Tendean, V.Y. (2018). Batalnya Surat Dakwaan Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Crimen Vol. VII/No. 5.
Wangke, C. G., (2017). Kajian Yuridis Perubahan Penuntutan Oleh Jaksa Dalam Perkara Pidana Menurut UU No. 8 tahun 1981. Lex Crimen Vol. VI/No. 1/Jan-Feb.
Sofyan, A., dan Aziz, A., (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta: Kencana.
Tiolong, I.A., (2018). Wewenang Pemecahan Perkara (Splitsing) Oleh Penuntut Umum Menurut Pasal 142 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981. Lex Crimen Vol. VII/No. 6
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Surat Edaran Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia No. B-69/E/02/1997 Perihal Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i2.309
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License