Telaah Kritis terhadap Fungsionalitas Gereja Toraja Berdasarkan Kritik Sosio-Religi Karl Marx
(1) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Abstract
This study aims to critique and evaluate the church's functionality, namely the church in its social function. The Toraja Church is still not here to carry out its real social function. As a result, various kinds of social injustice that are produced from culture settle right within the sphere of the church. The church exists only as a producer of the imagination: directing the imagination, without fixing problems on earth. This study uses a qualitative method with a literature observation approach. As a basis, the theory used in this research is Karl Marx's socio-religious criticism theory. The essence of this criticism is not rejection of religion, but rejection of religious practices which merely produce illusions, so as not to solve the problems experienced by society, especially Christians, as a result, society becomes alienated. The Toraja Church is required not to solve problems through imagined solutions, but instead to bring concrete liberating solutions in society. The church should be a real medicine where there is a sick soul due to the chaos of the world. With the revival of church functionality, the church has become a strong fortress for the community towards peace.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alkitab, (2009), Perjanjian Lama dan Perjanjian Baru. Jakarta: LAI.
Abdurahim, A., (2015), “Makna Biaya dalam Upacara Rambu Solo.†Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta: Jurnal Akuntansi Multi-paradigma, 6 (2): 55-65.
Azwar dan Subekan, A., 2016), Analisis Determinan Kemiskinan di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 2 (1):1-25.
Aritonang, J. S., (2017). Mereka juga citra Allah: hakikat dan sejarah diakonia termasuk bagi yang berkeadaan dan berkebutuhan khusus (buruh, migran & pengungsi, penyandang disabilitas, LGBT). Cetakan ke-1. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Bakker, A. dan A.C. Zubair, (2009), Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Chen, P.R., & Marthin, (2003), Teologi Gustavo Gutierrez: Refleksi dari Praksis Kaum Miskin. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Darmaputera, E, (2000), "Kebangkitan Agama dan Keruntuhan Etika†dalam Meretas Jalan Teologi Agama-agama di Indonesia: Theologia Religionum, Tim Balitbag PGI. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Darmawan, E. P., (2005), Agama Itu Bukan Candu: Tesis-tesis Feurbach, Marx, dan Tan Malaka. Yogyakarta: Resist Book.
Dase, A.B., (2019), “Kontribusi Hermeneutis 1 Raja-Raja 21 terhadap Konflik Agraria di Indonesia.†BIA’: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Kontekstual, 2 (1): 40–45.
Hesselgrave, D. J., dan Rommen, E., (2009), Kontekstualisasi: Makna, Metode, dan Model. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Nanuru, R.F., (2017), Gereja di Jalan Keadilan: Fungsi Sosial Gereja Menghadapi Masalah Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan Komunikasi di Bibir Pasifik. preprint (Open Science Framework).
Pangrante, F., (2017), “Mantunu Tedong dalam Pusaran Ideologi Adat, Agama dan Kapitalisme, Retorik 5, no. Agama dan Praktik Hidup Sehari-hari.†Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Ritzer, G, dan Douglas J.G, (2004), Teori Marxis dan Berbagai Ragam Teori Neo-Marxian. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.
Stott, J, (1984), Isu-isu Global: Menentang Kepemimpinan Kristiani. Jakarta: Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih/OMF,
Suseno, F .M, (1999), Pemikiran Karl Marx. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Schumann, Olaf, (2000), Milenium Ketiga & Tantangan Agama-Agama. Jakarta:Grasindo.
Tjahjadi, L., dan Simon, (2007), Tuhan Para Filsuf dan Ilmuwan: Dari Descartes Sampai Whtehead. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.556
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License