Peran Komitmen Afektif terhadap Perubahan sebagai Mediator Hubungan antara Pertukaran Pemimpin-Anggota dengan Kemampuan Mengatasi Perubahan pada Unit Area PT X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.581
Jonathan Permana(1), Endang Parahyanti(2),


(1) Universitas Indonesia
(2) Universitas Indonesia

Abstract


The development in the era of digitalization requires companies to make significant changes in their business processes to face competitors and adapt to the environment. This study aims to determine the role of affective commitment to change as a mediator of the leader-member exchange relationship with the ability to coping with change in the PT X Area Unit. Subjects totaled 222 participants from 7 Unit Area PT X. This study uses a quantitative method through online questionnaires, with a non-experimental research design with a correlation design and a mediation analysis of the research variables. The results of the mediation analysis show that affective commitment to change can act as a mediator with a form of full mediation between leader-member exchanges, with an indirect coefficient value of 0.08 with a 95% confidence interval value between 0.03 and 0.15 on the ability to cope with change. The results of study concluded that leader-member exchange can predict the ability of employees to deal with change if employees have an affective commitment to change.

Keywords


Coping with change; Leader-Member Exchange; Affective Commitment to Change; Mediation Analysis.

Full Text:

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.581

References


Abrell-Vogel, C., & Rowold, J. (2014). Leaders’ commitment to change and their effectiveness in change – a multilevel investigation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(6): 900-921.

Anshel, M. H., Kim, K. W., Kim, B. H., Chang, K. J., & Hom, H. J. (2001). A model for coping with stressful events in sport: Theory, application, and future directions. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 32: 43-75.

Callan, V. J. (1993). Individual and organizational strategies for coping with organizational change. Work & Stress, 7(1): 63-75.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). California: Sage Publication.

Cunningham, G. B. (2006). The relationships among commitment to change, and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1): 29-45.

Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leaders-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6): 1715-1759.

Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 571-579.

Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role making model in formal organizations: A developmental approach. (J. G. Hunt, & L. L. Larson, Eds.) Leadership Frontiers: 43-165.

Harden, E., Ford, L. R., Pattie, M., & Lanier, P. (2020). Understanding organizational change management: the role of micro and macro influences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol.ahead- of-print(Issue.ahead-of-print).

Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to Organizational Change: Extension of a Three-Component Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474-487.

Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1): 107-122.

Liden, R. C., & Masyln, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: Empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1): 43-72.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., & Busch, P. (2008). Want to, need to, ought to: Employee commitment to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(1), 32-52. Management, 20: 582-591.

Puspitasari, D. A., & Mangundjaya, W. L. (2019). Leader–member exchange and affective commitment to change: Mediating role of change self-efficacy. Education and Humanities Research, 431: 60-65.

Ritz, A., Shantz, A., Alfes, K., & Arshoff, A. S. (2012). Who needs leaders the most? The interactive effect of leadership and core self-evaluations on commitment to change in the public sector. International Public Management Journal, 15(2): 160-185.

Van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Schyns, B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change: The role of leader-member exchange, development climate, and change process characteristics. Applied Psychology, 57: 313-334.

Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 132-142.

Woodward, S., & Hendry, C. (2004). Leading and coping with change. Journal of Change Management, 4(2), 155-183.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.581

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License