Tradisi Mamat dalam membangun Relasi Sosial Keagamaan di Naikolan Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur
(1) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Abstract
This study aims to describe the understanding of the Evangelical Christian Church in the East regarding the hospitality contained tradition eating betel nut, especially next generation who will continue meaning of hospitality in tradition of mamat for daily life and use betel nut as a unifying tool and a sign of respect diversity congregation. Tradition eating betel nut is a symbol of hospitality in the tradition priest. Tradition of mamat provides a new understanding Evangelical Christian Church in the East of Mount Sinai that through betel nut is interpreted as a sign of love and hospitality to others both within the congregation and outside the church context. This research uses descriptive qualitative method. A qualitative approach that aims to accurately describe the characteristics individual, symptom, or group determine the causes frequency certain relationship between a symptom and other symptoms in society, so as obtain in-depth information through interviews with respondents. Mamat tradition also provides good change for the community, especially church because it can teach about mutual acceptance and respect regardless of status, tradition of eating betel nut together allows people have good behavior such as loving, appreciating, and respecting others. With the Mamat tradition, community mingled with each other without seeing any differences.
This study aims to describe the understanding of the Evangelical Christian Church in the East regarding the hospitality contained tradition eating betel nut, especially next generation who will continue meaning of hospitality in tradition of mamat for daily life and use betel nut as a unifying tool and a sign of respect diversity congregation. Tradition eating betel nut is a symbol of hospitality in the tradition priest. Tradition of mamat provides a new understanding Evangelical Christian Church in the East of Mount Sinai that through betel nut is interpreted as a sign of love and hospitality to others both within the congregation and outside the church context. This research uses descriptive qualitative method. A qualitative approach that aims to accurately describe the characteristics individual, symptom, or group determine the causes frequency certain relationship between a symptom and other symptoms in society, so as obtain in-depth information through interviews with respondents. Mamat tradition also provides good change for the community, especially church because it can teach about mutual acceptance and respect regardless of status, tradition of eating betel nut together allows people have good behavior such as loving, appreciating, and respecting others. With the Mamat tradition, community mingled with each other without seeing any differences.
Keywords: Mamat; Tradition; Betel Nut; Hospitality
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, S., (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Bagus, L., (2000). “Kamus Filsafat”. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Depertemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Pusat Penilitian Sejarah Dan Budaya Proyek Penilitian Sejarah Dan Pencatatan Kebudayaan Daerah. (1981). Adat istiadat Daerah Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jakarta.
Engel, J.D., (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Teologi Kristen. Salatiga: Widya Sari.
Firth, R., (1996). Religion: A Humanist Interpretation. London and New York: Routledge.
Greetz, C., (1992). “Kebudayaan dan Agama”. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Herusatoto, B, (2008). “Simbolisme Jawa”. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Hodges, S.D. & Klein, K.J., (2001). “Regulating the Cost of Empathy: the Price of Being Human”. Journal of Sosio-Economic. 3 (1): 242-252.
Kana, N.L., (1983). Dunia Orang Sawu. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Lewis, C. (2000). “Elementary Latin Dictionary”. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Laela, N.D,, (2007). “Fungsi dan Makna Simbolis Genta Di Jawa Tengah”. Semarang: Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Provinsi Jawa Tengah.
Maclver, R.M.M., (1960). “Society”. New York: Barnes and Noble College Outline Series.
Montandon, A., (2000). “L’hospitalite au XVIIe siecle”. France: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.
Nawawi, (2004). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogjakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Ricoeur, P, (1970). “The Symbolism of Evil”. Boston: Beacon Press.
Still, J., (2010). “Derrida and Hospitality – Theory and Practice”. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sutardi, T., (2007). “Antropologi: Mengungkapkan Keragaman Budaya”. Bandung: PT Setia Purnama Inves.
Touwely, S., (2020). Sirih Pinang Sebagai Simbol Pemersatu Keluarga Suatu Kajian Pemaknaan Budaya Sirih Pinang dalam Konteks Masyarakat Riring, Kecamata Taniwel)”, Ambon: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Keagamaan, I (1):12-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.746
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)Published by Mahesa Research Center Online ISSN: 2622-3740 | DOI Prefix: 10.34007 OAI-PMH: https://mahesainstitute.web.id/ojs2/index.php/jehss/oai |
Quick LinksFocus & Scope | Author Guidelines Editorial Team | Peer Reviewers |
Editorial Office & LicensePerumahan Griya Nafisa 2, Blok A No. 10, Jl. Benteng Hilir / Titi Sewa, Percut Sei Tuan, Deli Serdang, Sumatera Utara 20371
|





