Pengaruh Quality Of Work Life dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Keterlibatan Kerja Personil Satlantas Di Kepolisian Resort Kota Besar Medan

Ricky Ananda Marpaung(1), Saiful Ahyar Lubis(2), M. Rajab Lubis(3),


(1) Universitas Medan Area
(2) Universitas Medan Area
(3) Universitas Medan Area

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to see: The influence of quality of work life and professionalism on the engagement of satlantas personnel in the Police Resort Kota Besar Medan. Hypothesis proposed is there is an influence of quality of work life and professionalism on work engagement. The research was conducted on 65 Satlantas personnel with sampling techniques is purposive sampling. Data retrieval by scale method is the scale of work engagement, quality of work life scale and professionalism scale. The data is analyzed by multiple regression statistics. The results showed; 1). There is a significant influence between quality of work life and professionalism on Work Engagement, the value of the Coefficient freg = 42,113; correlation coefficient R = 0.703; p < 0.000. Thus the research hypothesis is accepted, there is an influence between the quality of work life and professionalism with work engagement. The total effective contribution of independent variables (quality of work life and professionalism) to work involvement is 46.4%. From these results it is known that there are still 53.6% of the influence of other factors on work engagement which is not seen in this study. 2). There is a significant influence between Quality Of Work Life on work engagement, with a correlation coefficient of 0.547; this means that the better the Quality Of Work Life, the better work engagement. Quality Of Work Life provides an effective contribution to the Work Involvement variable or the equivalent of 17.2%.3). There is a significant influence between professionalism and job involvement with a correlation coefficient of 0.646; this shows, the higher the professionalism, the better the Work Involvement of the Medan Police Traffic Police Personnel, and conversely, the lower the professionalism, the lower the work engagement. The professionalism variable gave an effective contribution to the Work Engagement variable by 32.3%.


Keywords


Work Engagement; Quality of Work Life; Professionalism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anoraga, P. (1998). Psikologi Kerja. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Brummelhuis, L.L. (2012). Work engagement, performance, and active learning: The role of conscientiousness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 555-564. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.008

Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Heuvel, M. V. D. (2015). Leader-member exchange, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 754-770. doi: 10.1108/JMP-03-2013-0088

Bruce, E.M, RSM Lau, and Johnson, S.K., (2009), “A Longitudinal Study of Quality of Work Life and Business Performanceâ€. Business Review.. LVIII(2), 3â€7

Cascio, W.F, (2013), Managing Human Resources : Productivity, Quality of Worklife, Profits. Fourth Edition. Singapore: Mc Graw Hills Inc. 234-245.

Ching-Fu, C., & Ya-Ling, K. (2015). The role of work engagement and job tenure as moderators of the burnout–performance relationship among flight attendants. Diunduh dari www.wctr2013rio.com. Pada tanggal 12 Desember 2020.

Dhivya, A. S., & Sripirabaa, B. (2015). The impact of quality of work life on work engagement: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 6(1), 139-150. Diunduh dari http://www.iaeme.com/IJM.asp

Djamin, A. (2000). Pengembangan Sistem Manajemen Personel Polri Di Masa Depan. Jurnal Polisi Indonesia. Tahun 2. Halaman 47-54. Program Pascasarjana Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian Universitas Indosnesia -Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Djamin, A., (2004). Menuju Polri Mandiri Yang Profesional. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Yayasan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia.

Hall, C.S., dan Lindzey, G. (1993). Treories of Personality. Teori-Teori Sifat dan Behavioristik. Alih Bahasa: oleh A. Supratiknya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Lau R.S.M & May, E.B. (2008). A Win-Win Paradigm For Quality of Work Life and Business Performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 9 No.3.

Mohan, L.Bowsher., (2014). Quality of work life sustains vibrant organization culture: A study on kerafed oil complex. International journal of humanities and social science, 217-222

Muhammad, F. (2010). Pengubahan Perilaku dan Kebudayaan Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Polri. Jurnal Polisi Indonesia. Tahun 2. Halaman 47-54. Program Pascasarjana Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian Universitas Indonesia-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Robbins, S.P. (2011). Organizational Behavior Konsepth, Conrtroversies, Aplication Eighth Edition. Prentice Hall Internasional.

Robbins, S.P., (2007), Teori Organisasi: Stuktur, Desain dan Aplikasi, Edisi Ketiga, Cetakan Kedua, alih bahasa Jusuf Udaya, Arcan, Jakarta, hlm. 479.

Schaufeli, W.B., & Bakker, A. (2014). UWES: Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Utrecht University: Occupational Health Psychology Unit.

Schein, E.H, (2016). Psikologi Organisasi, Terjemahan Indonesia. Jakarta : LPPM dan Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.

Tabah, A. (2001). Menatap Dengan Mata Hati Polisi Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tabah, A. (2016). Reformasi Kepolisian. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). 2002. Pasal 4 sampai dengan Pasal 11. (Pasal 16 UU No 2 Tahun 2002.

Zin, R.M. (2014), “ Perception of Professional Engineers Toward Quality of Work Life and Organizational Commitmentâ€, Gajahmada International Journal of Business, 6(3), 323-334




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i3.911

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License