JCCS Policy � Section D.14
Double-Blind Peer Review Process
Rigorous Two-Stage Evaluation by Independent Subject-Matter Experts
Every research article submitted to Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies (JCCS) is evaluated through a strict Double-Blind Peer Review process, in which both the identities of the authors and the identities of the reviewers are concealed from one another throughout the evaluation cycle.
Step-by-Step Editorial & Review Workflow
- Stage 1 � Initial Desk Evaluation & Turnitin Check (3�7 Days): The Editor-in-Chief and Section Editor inspect the submission for alignment with JCCS's scope (Communication, Media, Sociology, Anthropology), adherence to the JCCS template, and Turnitin similarity index (must be ? 30%). Non-compliant manuscripts are returned for revision or desk-rejected.
- Stage 2 � Double-Blind Peer Review Assignment (2�4 Weeks): Anonymized manuscripts that pass desk screening are assigned to at least two (2) independent peer reviewers with demonstrated expertise in communication, media studies, sociology, or cultural anthropology.
- Stage 3 � Editorial Decision Categories: Based on the reviewers' structured assessment forms, the Editor issues one of four decisions:
- Accept Submission: Ready for copyediting as written.
- Revisions Required (Minor Revisions): Acceptance contingent on minor clarifications verified by the Section Editor (7�14 days).
- Resubmit for Review (Major Revisions): Substantial theoretical or methodological revisions required; re-evaluated by the original reviewers (14�21 days).
- Decline Submission (Reject): Fundamental flaws in methodology, originality, or scope.
- Stage 4 � Copyediting, Layout, & Proofreading (1�2 Weeks): Accepted manuscripts undergo professional language editing, APA 7th reference verification, CrossRef DOI assignment (
10.34007/jccs.vXiY.ID), and final PDF galley approval by the corresponding author prior to online publication.