Analisis Konflik dalam Perspektif Freud dan Relevansinya dengan Pabrik Semen di Rembang

Sidik Puryanto(1),


(1) Universitas Terbuka

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the conflict of Sigmund Freud's perspective and it’s relevance to the cement factory in Rembang. This research method used a case study qualitative approach. The informants of this research consisted of 20 people, both from the support and contra of the cement factory. The data collection used unstructured interviews. Data analysis used three steps from Miles and Huberman. The results of this study indicate (1) human characters in conflict are divided into three categories, namely the id, ego and superego, which in Fisher's language are also referred to as stages of conflict; (2) the cement factory conflict in Rembang, seen from the emotional pattern, contains three group characteristics, namely the silent group, the moving group and the resisting group. The conclusion of this study showed that each conflict will experience escalation depending on the pattern of emotions. The emotions increase along with the contradictory productivity of conflict issues.


Keywords


Cement Factory; Sigmund Freud; Character of Conflict

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aragon, L. V. (2001). C om m unal V iolence in Poso , C entral S ulaw esi : W here P eople E at F ish A nd F ish E at P eople. 72(October 2001).

Barker, R. (2018). Sigmund Freud: Di Seberang Masa Lalu. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.

Fisher, S., dkk. (2001). Mengelola Konflik: Keterampilan & Strategi untuk Bertindak. Jakarta: The British Council.

Haseman, A. R. _ J. (2004). The military and democracy in Indonesia. In The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific. https://doi.org/10.22459/mdap.03.2004.02

Hidayatullah, U., Rini, H.S., & Arsal, T. (2016). Analisis Peta Konflik Pembangunan Pabrik Pt. Semen Indonesia Di Kecamatan Gunem Kabupaten Rembang. Solidarity: Journal of Education, Society and Culture, 5(1), 10–21.

Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (2012). Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research. In The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274.n2

Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.

Khusnia, K. (2018). Resolusi Konflik Pembangunan Pabrik Semen di Kecamatan Gunem Kabupaten Rembang. Ejournal Undip, 1–20. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/viewFile/20047/18924

Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional Man: Studies in Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Routledge.

Ngadisah. (2006a). Konflik Pembangunan dan Gerakan Sosial Politik di Papua. yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Poloma, M. (2010). Sosiologi Kontemporer. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pruit & Rubbin. (2009). Teori Konflik Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar. Jogjakarta.

Puryanto, S., dan Hariyadi, A. (2018). Pemahaman (Learning to Know) Konflik dan Malfungsi Agen sebagai Substansi Pendidikan Konflik dalam Kasus Konflik Pabrik Semen di Rembang Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 10(1).

Puryanto, S. (2018). Factors Mining Conflict; Local Perception (Cement Mining Conflict in Rembang Central Java Indonesia). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(11), 1356–1359.

Puryanto, S., dan Suyahmo. (2019). Urban Social Movement in Indonesia. International Journal of Sciences and Research (Ponte Journal)., 75(1), 124–140.

Puryanto, S. (2019a). Persepsi Masyarakat Millennial terhadap Makna Konflik. Jurnal Terapung, 1(1), 18–30.

Puryanto, S dan Didi, S. (2019). Konflik dan Gerakan Sosial di Rembang (Pertarungan Ekonomi Politik dan Lingkungan). Ombak. Yogyakarta

Salsabila, A. P., & Riandini, V. A. (2019). Pemaknaan Kepentingan Masyarakat dan Kepentingan Hukum Bisnis-Ekonomi dalam Pembangunan ( Studi Kasus Pembangunan PT Semen Indonesia di Rembang ). Lex Scientia Law Review, 3(1), 87–102.

Puryanto, S. (2022). Konflik, Karakter dan Pancasila: Studi Kepustakaan. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(4), 2351–2360. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i4.1076

Scott, J. (1993). Perlawanan Kaum Tani. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Silaen, V. (2006). Gerakan Sosial Baru: Perlawanan Komunitas Lokal Pada Kasus Indranayon Di Toba Samosir. Jogjakarta: IRE Press.

Suharko. (2013). Karst: Ditambang atau Dilestarikan Konflik Sosial Rencana Pembangunan Pabrik Semen. 17(November).

Sukayadi, Y., Sriyono, A., & Wiyono, S. (2014). Konflik Pertanahan Dalam Rencana Pendirian Pabrik Semen (Studi Di Kabupaten Rembang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah).

Sutaryo. (1992). Dinamika Masyarakat dalam Prespektif Konflik. Fisopol UGM.

Suyahmo. (2007). Filsafat Dialektika Hegel: Relevansinya dengan Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Humaniora, 2(143–150).

Suyahmo. (2014). Demokrasi dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Magnum Press.

Tanasaldy, T. (2007). 2007 “Ethnic Identity Politics in West Kalimantanâ€, in Schulte Nordholt, Henk and Gerry van Klinken, (eds).

Timmer, J. (2005). State Society and Governance in Melanesia DECENTRALISATION AND ELITE POLITICS IN PAPUA. Spring.

Wijayanto, A., Arifien, M., & Sriyanto. (2020). Sikap Masyarakat Terhadap Keberadaan Pabrik Semen di Desa Tegaldowo Kabupaten Rembang. Edu Geography, 8(1), 1–9.

Yin. (2011). Qualitative Research From Start to Finish. New York. London. The Guilford Press.

Zamroni. (1992). Pengantar Pengembangan Teori Sosial. Tiara Wacana.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i2.1182

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License