Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian oleh Bank dalam Memberikan Kredit
(1) Universitas Medan Area
Abstract
The activity of channeling funds through credit occupies the most important position, because it provides the greatest profit and opinion. The profit comes from credit interest which is commonly called fee-based income, therefore in lending must be carried out with the principle of prudence through accurate and in-depth analysis. The research in writing this scientific work is normative juridical research. Normative juridical research is research that examines the application of legal rules and norms related to the topic discussed. The nature of this research is descriptive, namely research that analyzes a legal regulation. The process of implementing credit to customers is carried out in a way: File Submission, Investigation of former loans, Interview I, On The Spot, Interview II, Credit Decision, Signing of credit contracts / other agreements, Credit Realization, Distribution / withdrawal. In applying the prudential principle in providing credit, banks can analyze the data and character of prospective customers by applying the 5P principle and the 5C principle. The process of resolving disputes between banks and customers in the event of bad credit can be done through non-litigation channels, which are out-of-court settlements and through litigation channels, which are the last resort of banks to make efforts to recover debtor credit either by executing credit collateral, taking over credit collateral by banks or by filing a lawsuit in the District Court.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayu, D. A., & Wahyoeono, D. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-hatian Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Melalui E-Cormmerce (Akulaku). Bureaucracy Journal, 648-658.
Bungin, B. (2003). Analisa Data Penelitian Kualitatif, Pemahaman Filosofi dan Metodologis Kearah Penguasaan Modal Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hrp, A. P., & Saraswati, D. (2020). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Surabaya: CV Jakad Media Publishing.
Ibrahim, J. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Surabaya: Bayu Media.
Marzuki, P. M. (2006). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Muchtar, B., Rahmidan, R., & Siwi, M. K. (2016). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Jakarta: Kencana.
Nurwahjuni, & Shomat, A. (2017). Four Eyes Principles dalam Pengelolaan Risiko Kredit Pada Bank. Jurnal Yuridika.
Podung, D. M. (2016). KREDIT MACET DAN PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DALAM PERBANKAN. Lex Crimen, 49-56.
Putra, W., & Widjaja, H. (2018). PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DALAM PENYALURAN KREDIT (Studi Kasus di Bank BRI Cabang Semarang). Refleksi Hukum, 81-96.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (1996). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Surya, I. P., Sukandia, I. N., & Styawati, N. K. (2021). PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET MELALUI UPAYA LITIGASI DI KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM SURYA MANDIRI DI KABUPATEN GIANYAR. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 440-446.
Tumbel, C. Y. (2015). ASPEK-ASPEK PENILAIAN DALAM PEMBERIAN KREDIT BANK. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 44-51.
Usman, R. (2001). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wahyuni, N. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip 5 C Dalam Pemberian Kredit Sebagai Perlindungan Bank. Lex Journal, 1-20.
Wijaya, E. S., & Sukranatha, A. A. (2016). PENCEGAHAN KREDIT MACET DENGAN PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DALAM PENYALURAN KREDIT PERBANKAN. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 1-13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i4.1772
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License