Email this article Multi Patronage and Melting-Pot Social Cleavage: Secularist Political Parties Defeat Islamist Political Parties in Muslim Society
(1) Brawijaya University
Abstract
A partisan affiliation built from social basic and social cleavage in a relationsip of political parties and civil society as mostly discussed, found its new trend to be endshown by local political practices. This study examined why secularist political parties defeat Islamic political parties in muslim society. This study applicate phenomenology to investigate patronage and clientelism relationship between political parties and societies in research area of Probolinggo, East Java. This study had explored four findings, firstly, weakening of support from traditional Muslim societies with Nahdhatul Ulama (NU) affiliated, called nahdhiyyin, to Islamic parties and the tendency to support secularist parties particularly to PDIP. Secondly, multi patronage phenomena and diversed clientelism which weakens nahdliyin support to Islamic party and crossing over of political support to secularist parties. Thirdly, personal politics from local strong man effect shaped multi patronage and divergent clientelism as well as ends partisan affiliation. Fourthly, social basic had no longer a linear relationship to political parties hence social cleavage faded into new shape, is a melting-pot social cleavage. These findings point out weakening of social basic of Islamic political parties, as irrelevantly political party relationship with social basic to support electoral capacity.Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-hamdi, R. (2019). The Decline of Ideology in Indonesia: Parliamentary Threshold and Cleavage among Political Parties in coping with the 2019 Election. 353(IcoSIHESS), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.47
Allen, D. (2014). The invisible work of nurses: hospitals, organisation and healthcare. Routledge.
Ari Ganjar Herdiansah, Junaidi, H. I. (2017). Pembelahan Ideologi, Kontestasi Pemilu, Dan Persepsi Ancaman Keamanan Nasional: Spektrum Politik Indonesia Pasca 2014? Jurnal Wacana Politik, 2(1), 61–73.
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. NUS Press.
Basedau, M., & Stroh, A. (2011). Measuring Party Institutionalization in Developing Countries: A New Research Instrument Applied to 28 African Political Parties. SSRN Electronic Journal, February. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1119203
Bértoa, F. C. (2014). Party systems and cleavage structures revisited. Party Politics, 20(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436042
Bonilla, C. A., Carlin, R. E., Love, G. J., & Méndez, E. S. (2011). Social or political cleavages? A spatial analysis of the party system in post-authoritarian Chile. Public Choice, 146(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9580-2
Brox, B. J., Shaw, D. R., Katz, R. S., & Crotty, W. (2009). Handbook of Party Politics. Sage chapter Political Parties, American Campaigns, and Effects on Outcomes.
Buehler, M. (2018). Elite Competition and Changing State-Society Relations: Shari’a Policymaking in Indonesia. Beyond Oligarchy, 1(2013), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719158-011
Buehler, M., Iagnemma, K., & Singh, S. (2009). The DARPA urban challenge: autonomous vehicles in city traffic (Vol. 56). springer.
Carman, T. (2017). Martin heidegger. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687315
Crotty, W. (2014). Polarized Politics: The Impact of Divisiveness in the US Political System. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Dan, P., Politik, P., & Indonesia, D. I. (2016). PEMILU DAN PARTAI POLITIK DI INDONESIA: Menanti Kebangkitan Partai Politik Islam di Tahun 2019. Tamaddun, 15(1), 107–148.
Disraeli, B. (2018). Social Cleavages and Party Systems. Principles of Comparative Politics, 585–644.
Ezrow, N. M. (2011). Briefing Paper : The Importance of Parties and Party System Institutionalization in New Democracies. Institute for Democracy and Conflict Resolution (IDCR), 189(8).
Fossati, D. (2016). Partisan Affiliations Remain Strong in Indonesia. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore.
Fuller, G., & Kurpershoek, M. (2004). What future for political Islam. WRR.
Gredel, E. (2017). Digital discourse analysis and Wikipedia: Bridging the gap between Foucauldian discourse analysis and digital conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.010
Gyene, P. I. (2019). Democracy, Islam and Party System in Indonesia: towards a consensus-oriented model? PCD Journal, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.41970
Herdiansah, A. G. (2017). Pragmatisme Partai Islam Di Indonesia: Pendekatan Tindakan Sosial. Sosioglobal : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 1(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.24198/j.sosioglobal.1.2.5
Heywood, A. (2014). Global politics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Huntington, S. P. (2004). Benturan antar peradaban dan masa depan politik dunia.
Katz, R. S., & Crotty, W. (2006). Handbook of party politics. Handbook of Party Politics, 1–550. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608047
Kuswandoro, W. E. (2023). Habitus and Personal Trust as a Strategy to Drive Community Participation in the Implementation of Government Policy. 12(3), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i3.9294
Latief, H. (2013). The politics of benevolence: Political patronage of party-based charitable organizations in contemporary Indonesian Islam. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 51(2), 337–363.
Latief, M. (2017). Islam dan Sekularisasi Politik di Indonesia. Tsaqafah, 13(1), 1–24.
Lillemets, J. (2015). Social divisions defining voting behavior : impact of cleavages on party choice. 74.
Lowndes, V. (2002). Institutionalism. In Theories and methods in political science (pp. 90–108). Palgrave.
Lutfi, M. (2018). Pelembagaan Partai Politik di Tingkat Lokal. March.
Mack, C. S. (2010). When Political Parties Die: A Cross-National Analysis of Disalignment and Realignment.
Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2005). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. Working Paper of the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, 319, 1–38.
Mair, P., Katz, R. S., Kolodny, R., Muller, W. C., Deschouwer, K., Webb, P. D., Bille, L., Sundberg, J., & Poguntke, T. (2020). Contributors Preface and Acknowledgements 1 Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State. 10–11.
Miichi, K. (2014). Democratization and “Failure†of Islamic Parties in Indonesia. Southeast Asian Muslims in the Era of Globalization, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436818_7
Parties, P. (2012). Political Parties and Democracy. In Political Parties and Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137277206
Peña-Guzmán, D. M. (2020). French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 79(December 2018), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.01.006
Prentoulis, M., & Kyriakidou, M. (2019). Media and collective action in Greece: From indignation to solidarity. International Journal of Communication, 13, 22–40.
Randall, V. (2006). Party Institutionalization and its Implications for Democracy. 1997, 1–40.
Ribeiro, P. F., & Locatelli, L. (2019). Time after time: Party organizational strength in new and old democracies. Opiniao Publica, 25(1), 199–233. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912019251199
Safei, A. A. (2015). in a Nation of Muslims Political Islam Is Struggling To Win Vote : Role of Islam and the Political Crisis in Indonesia. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 08(07), 319–326.
Samnuzulsari, T., Edison, E., & Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2019). From Popular to Partisan Public Sphere: The Political Change of the Coffee Shops in Kepulauan Riau. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 11(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i1.17235
Santo, P. D. E., Lisi, M., & Costa, B. F. (2018). Party membership and activism in a new democracy: Evidence from the portuguese case. Dados, 61(4), 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1590/001152582018165
Scarrow, S. E. (2009). Political Activism and Party Members. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, May 2018, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0034
Schmidt, F. (2020). Party populism and media access: The news value of populist communication and how it is handled by the mass media. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2360–2382.
Shefter, M. (1977). Party and patronage: Germany, england, and italy. Politics & Society, 7(4), 403–451.
Sholihin, A. I. (2013). Buku pintar ekonomi syariah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sirry, M. A. (2007). Transformation of Political Islam in Post-Suharto Indonesia. The Blackwell Companion to Contemporary Islamic Thought, 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996188.ch28
Subedi, D. B., & Scott, A. (2021). Populism, authoritarianism, and charismatic-plebiscitary leadership in contemporary Asia: a comparative perspective from India and Myanmar. Contemporary Politics, 27(5), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1917162
Ufen, A. (2009). Mobilising Political Islam: Indonesia and Malaysia Compared. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 47(3), 308–333.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i1.1778
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License