Methods of Analyzing Judges' Decisions in Normative Legal Research Case-based Approach and Islamic Law
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Abstract
This study aims to examine how decision analysis studies should be conducted. In addition to examining the case approach in normative legal research, which is a commonly used approach in decision analysis studies, this study was also conducted to investigate the methods and characteristics of decision analysis. Using qualitative and document research methods, data was collected through focus group discussions and documentation. This study found that decision analysis research is specifically a case-specific study, possibly using philosophical and conceptual approaches simultaneously. The steps of decision analysis research also specifically follow the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Attention and Conclusion) method. This study is expected to contribute to the development of the discourse on legal research methodology with its various approaches, especially approaches that have been introduced in normative legal research. Practically, this study is expected to provide guidance for students to conduct normative legal research with a case approach, especially in decision analysis research. The results of this study are also expected to be a guide for supervisors to guide students who conduct normative legal research with a case approach, especially research on the analysis of judges' decisions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584.
Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2012). Using case study in education research. Sage.
Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2013). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues. Routledge.
Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Tait, J., & Meagher, L. (2011). Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies for capturing creativity. Bloomsbury Academic.
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. (9th ed.). Prenada Media Group.
Masidin, S. H. (2023). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Analisis Putusan Hakim. Prenada Media.
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919862424.
Shidarta, K. P. H. D. K. (2006). Ke-Indonesiaan. Jakarta: Penerbit CV Utomo.
Sitorus, I. R., & Andika, A. S. (2022). Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Perceraian Akibat Murtad Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. Mu’asyarah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 19–32.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan. Singkat, Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.
Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative case studies.
Stern, E. K. (1999). Crisis decisionmaking: A cognitive institutional approach (Vol. 6). Citeseer.
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1–18.
Yin, R. K. (1997). Studi kasus (desain dan metode).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v6i3.1972
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License