Evaluasi Context, Input, Process, dan Product Program Permata di Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi Wilayah I Sumatera Utara

Armiadi Asamat(1), Slamet Widodo(2), Yoyok Hendarso(3),


(1) Universitas Sriwijaya
(2) Universitas Sriwijaya
(3) Universitas Sriwijaya

Abstract


This evaluation research was conducted to analyze and find out how the Permata Program was carried out in LLDikti Region I during the period 2016 to 2018. This research was conducted using a qualitative approach combined with the CIPP Evaluation Model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). The data collection consists of semi-structured interview method, literature study, and documentation. The informants of this study consisted of three elements; managers of the LLDikti’s HES Program, Managers of the HES Program at universities, and alumni of the HES Program. Informants were determined purposively, with special criteria coming from universities that were consistently active in the HES Program during the three years of its implementation. The results showed that the program has benefits for its participants and requires some improvements in its implementation. Program inhibiting factors: funding administration, control of input aspects; the availability of information of study program curriculum information, and communication between institutions. The supporting factor for implementing the Permata Program is the political will. Benefits of the Permata Program: the occurrence of scientific cultural exchanges to enrich and strengthen the uniqueness of each university; the occurrence of regional cultural exchanges to strengthen patriotism; gain student’s insight and experience; and probability of increasing the quality of study program accreditation.

Keywords


Evaluation; Context; Input; Process; Product; Homeland Student Exchange Program.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnani, M. (2020, March 9). Update CPNS 9 Maret 2020, Ini Rincian Kelulusan Passing Grade Tiap Formasi Halaman all - Kompas.com. Www.Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/03/09/200000165/update-cpns-9-maret-2020-ini-rincian-kelulusan-passing-grade-tiap-formasi?page=all#page2

Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya (Kedua). Kencana.

Cahyono, C. (2018). Dampak Perkembangan Sosial Budaya terhadap Nasionalisme Mahasiswa. Civic Edu : Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.23969/CIVICEDU.V2I1.1313

Daly, A. (2011). Determinants of participating in Australian university student exchange programs. Journal of Research in International Education, 10(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240910394979

Darodjat, D., & M, W. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program. Islamadina, Volume XIV(1), 1–28.

Hartomo, G. (2020). Hasil CPNS 2019, 11.580 Formasi Masih Kosong : Okezone Economy. Www.Okezone.Com. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2020/11/13/320/2309206/hasil-cpns-2019-11-580-formasi-masih-kosong?page=1

Jasmarnisa, T. J., & Ersya, M. P. (2018). Pengaruh Program PERMATA terhadap Wawasan Kebangsaan Mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of Civic Education, 1(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v1i2.244

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1), 118.

Messer, D., & Wolter, S. C. (2007). Are student exchange programs worth it? Higher Education, 54(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9016-6

pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id. (n.d.). PDDikti - Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi. Retrieved November 7, 2020, from https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/pt

Priambodo, B. (2016). Program Pertukaran Pemuda AIESEC Indonesia untuk Mempromosikan Budaya Lokal ke Masyarakat Internasional. http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/70851

Santosa, H. C. (2020). Bagaimana Memperkuat Wawasan Kebangsaan bagi Generasi Milenial? | Radio Idola Semarang. Www.Radioidola.Com. https://www.radioidola.com/2018/bagaimana-memperkuat-wawasan-kebangsaan-bagi-generasi-milenial/

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2004). Evaluation Design Checklist. https://wmich.edu/evaluation/checklists.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (2nd Editio). Jossey-bass.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif, dan konstruktif (Ketiga). Alfabeta.

Sulistyo, A. (2017). Evaluasi Program Budaya Membaca di Sekolah Dasar Negeri. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2017.v4.i1.p48-58




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i1.563

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)

Publisher: Mahesa Research Center

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License