Demokrasi Oligarkis dan Resesi Demokrasi di Indonesia Pasca-Suharto: Sebuah Tinjauan Sejarah Politik

Ahmad Muhajir(1), Febriyantika Wulandari(2),


(1) Universitas Andalas
(2) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa

Abstract


Artikel ini menyajikan tinjauan sistematis atas literatur tentang oligarki di Indonesia, yang menawarkan interpretasi khas tentang perubahan politik di Indonesia. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan sejarah. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa literatur ini memiliki tiga poin penting. Pertama, literatur ini mengajak kita untuk terus merenungkan cara-cara jatuhnya rezim otoriter. Jatuhnya rezim otoriter sering digambarkan sebagai kemenangan mobilitas masyarakat sipil yang pro-demokrasi. Sementara banyak ahli Indonesia menerima pandangan utama ini dalam menjelaskan kejatuhan rezim Suharto, literatur oligarki menunjukkan bahwa kejatuhan tersebut disebabkan bukan begitu banyak oleh bangkitnya kekuatan masyarakat sipil, melainkan oleh ketegangan antara Suharto dan para oligarki, di mana Suharto ditinggalkan oleh mereka. Kedua, oligarki juga mendorong kita untuk mengkaji kembali sifat demokrasi baru di Indonesia. Berbeda dengan pandangan utama tentang demokratisasi yang berpendapat bahwa negara ini sedang mengalami tahap 'konsolidasi' menuju demokrasi liberal, literatur oligarki melihat transisi politik di Indonesia sebagai perjalanan menuju jenis demokrasi yang kurang liberal, yaitu demokrasi oligarkis. Ketiga, Indonesia mengalami transisi dari sistem politik otoriter menjadi demokratis, yang pada awalnya menunjukkan perkembangan menuju konsolidasi demokrasi. Namun, dalam perjalanan proses tersebut, terjadi resesi demokratisasi yang membentuk demokrasi oligarkis.


Keywords


Oligarki; transisi politik; demokratisasi; demokrasi oligarkis; sejarah politik Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, B. (1996). Elections and Participation in Three Southeast Asian Countries. In R. H. Taylor (Ed.), The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia (pp. 12–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Aspinall, E. (2004). Indonesia: Transformation of Civil Society and Democratic Breakthrough. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space (pp. 61–96). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Aspinall, E., & Warburton, E. (2018). Indonesia: The Dangers of Democratic Regression. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICSPS 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/icsps-17.2018.1.

Baswedan, A. (2004). Sirkulasi Suara Dalam Pemilu 2004. Analisis CSIS, 33(2), 173–89.

Bratton, M., & Van de Walle, N. (1994). Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transition in Africa. World Politics, 46(4), 453–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950715.

Case, W. (2002). Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or Less. London: Routledge Curzon.

Chehabi, H. E., & Linz, J. J. (2000a). A Theory of Sultanism 1: A Type of Nondemocratic Rule. In H. E. Chehabi & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Sultanistic Regimes (pp. 3–25). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chehabi, H. E., & Linz, J. J. (2000b). A Theory of Sultanism 2: Genesis and Demise of Sultanistic Regimes. In H. E. Chehabi & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Sultanistic Regimes (pp. 26–49). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chua, C. (2008). Chinese Big Business in Indonesia: The State of Capital. London: Routledge.

Crouch, H. (2010). Political Reform in Indonesia after Soeharto. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Davidson, J. (2009). Dilemmas of Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 22(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740903068354.

Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17.

Fealy, C. (2001). Parties and Parliament: Serving Whose Interest? In G. Lloyd & S. Smith (Eds.), Indonesia Today: Challenges of History (pp. 97–111). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Fukuoka, Y. (2012). Politics, Business, and the State in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 34(1), 80–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1355/cs34-1d.

Fukuoka, Y. (2012). Indonesia’s “Democratic Transition†Revisited: A Clientelist Model of Political Transition. Democratization, 20(6), 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.669894.

Fukuoka, Y. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Political Studies Review, 11(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00286.x.

Hadiz, V. R. (2003). Reorganizing Political Power in Indonesia: A Reconsideration of So-Called Democratic Transition. The Pacific Review, 16(4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000132272.

Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asian Perspective. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Hadiz, V. (2017). Indonesia’s Year of Democratic Setbacks: Towards a New Phase of Deepening Illiberalism?. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53, 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1410311.

Hefner, R. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Johnson Tan, P. (2006). Indonesia Seven Years after Soeharto: Party System Institutionalization in a New Democracy. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28(1), 88–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/csa.2006.0009.

King, Y. D. (2003). Half-Hearted Reform: Electoral Institutions and the Struggle for Democracy in Indonesia. Westport CT: Praeger.

Lane, M. (2008). Unfinished Nation: Indonesia Before and After Suharto. London: Verso.

Linz, J. J. (1997). Some Thoughts on the Victory and Future of Democracy. In A. Hadenius (Ed.), Democracy’s Victory and Crisis (pp. 404–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mackie, J. (1999). Indonesia: Economic Growth and Depoliticization. In J. W. Morley (Ed.), Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 123–141). Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Mietzner, M. (2008). Comparing Indonesia’s Party Systems of the 1950s and the Post-Suharto Era: From Centrifugal to Centripetal Inter-party Competition. Journal of Southeast Asia Studies, 39(3), 431–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463408000337.

Mietzner, M. (2012). Indonesia’s Democratic Stagnation: Anti-reformist Elites and Resilient Civil Society. Democratization, 19(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572620.

Moore, B. (1967). The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston MA: Beacon Press.

Power, T.P. (2018). Jokowi’s Authoritarian Turn and Indonesia’s Democratic Decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 307-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1549918.

Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge Curzon.

Rodan, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2006). Conflict and the New Political Participation in Southeast Asia. Murdoch University Asia Research Centre Working Paper, 129, 1–21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228933057_Conflict_and_the_New_Political_Participation_in_Southeast_Asia

Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

Santoso, A. (1997). Democratization: The Case of Indonesia’s New Order. In A. Laothamatas (Ed.), Democratization in Southeast and East Asia (pp. 21–45). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Sherlock, S. (2004). The 2004 Indonesian Elections: How the System Works and What the Parties Stand for. Centre for Democratic Institutions, Australian National University.

Slater, D. (2004). Indonesia’s Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition. Indonesia, 78, 61–92. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1813/54328.

Slater, D. (2008). Democracy and Dictatorship Do Not Float Freely: Structural Sources of Political Regimes in Southeast Asia. In E. M. Kuhonta, D. Slater, & T. Vu (Eds.), Southeast Asia in Political Science: Theory, Region, and Qualitative Analysis (pp. 55–79). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Snyder, R. (1998). Paths out of Sultanistic Regimes: Combining Structural and Voluntarist Perspectives. In H. E. Chehabi & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Sultanistic Regimes (pp. 49–84). Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tomsa, D. (2008). Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the Post-Suharto Era. London: Routledge.

Ufen, A. (2006). Political Parties in Post-Suharto Indonesia: Between Politik Aliran and Philippinisation. GIGA Working Papers 37. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/gigawp/37.html.

Uhlin, A. (1997). Indonesia and the ‘Third Wave of Democratisation’. New York: St Martin’s Press.

Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2018). Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency and Popular Opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 41, 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2k.

Webber, D. (2006). A consolidated patrimonial democracy? Democratization in post-Suharto Indonesia. Democratization, 13(3), 396-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340600579284.

White, G. (2004). Civil Society, Democratization and Development: Clearing the Analytical Ground. In P. Burnell & P. Calvert (Eds.), Civil Society in Democratization (pp. 6–21). London: Frank Class.

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/warisan.v4i1.1876

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Muhajir, Febriyantika Wulandari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Warisan: Journal of History and Cultural Heritage
Published by Mahesa Research Center
E-mail: warisan.journal@gmail.com

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International