Model pembelajaran auditory intellectually repetition terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa

Madi Amin(1), Muliana Muliana(2), Rohantizani Rohantizani(3),


(1) Universitas Malikussaleh
(2) Universitas Malikussaleh
(3) Universitas Malikussaleh

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical critical thinking ability of students who were taught using the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model was better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who were taught through a scientific learning approach. This study uses a quantitative approach and the type of research used is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were 11th grade students of SMA Negeri 5 Simeulue Barat, the samples in this study were two classes selected using a nonprobability sampling technique of purposive sampling type, namely class 11 IPA-1 as an experimental class using the Auditory Intellectually Repetition model and class 11 IPA-2 as a control class using a scientific approach. The data processing technique uses SPSS version 25 with the results of the study showing that: the value of Sig (p-value) > 0.05), it is accepted that it is 0.629 in the experimental class and 0.273 in the control class so that the data has a normal distribution. The t-test analysis of students' mathematical critical thinking skills was obtained 0.001 < 0.05, then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. This means that the mathematical critical thinking ability of students who are taught with the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model is better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who are taught with a scientific learning approach.

Keywords


Auditory Intellectually Repetition, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa; Barisan dan Deret Aritmatika; Saintifik.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainia, Q., Kurniasih, N., & Sapti, M. (2012) Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Karakter Belajar Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri Se-Kecamatan Kaligesing Tahun 2011/2012. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika “Kontribusi Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika dalam Membangun Karakter Guru dan Siswa" Yogyakrta, 10 November 2012. Yogyakrta: Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY.

Baron, J. B & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Depdiknas. (2002). Ringkasan Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi

Harahap, L. H. (2019). Efekktivitas Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intelectually Repetition (AIR) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa di SMK Kesehatan Sidimpuan Husada. Jurnal MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal), 2(2), 39-48.

Hasratuddin. (2010). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. Disertasi. Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Hutagalung, A., & Harahap, M. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Spasial Siswa Melalui Penggunaan Model Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) di SMP Negeri 1 Pinangsori. Jurnal MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal), 1(1), 15-23.

Ismaimuzah, D. (2013). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Teknologi, 63(2), 33-37.

Kemendikbud. Praturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 103 Tahun 2014 Pasal 2 Ayat 7 dan 8 Tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Lambertus. (2009). Pentingnya Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Forum Kependidikan, 28(2), 136-142.

Mahmuzah, R. 2015. Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Problem Posing. Jurnal Peluang. Vol. 4. No. 1.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible ‘‘hidden variable’’ in diagnostic pretest scores. American Association of Physics Teachers, 70(12), 1259-1268. Doi: 10.1119/1.1514215

Splitter, L. J. (1991). Critical Thinking: What, why, when, and how. Educational Philosophy and Teory, 23(1), 89-109.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Yuwanda, M., Chotimah, U., & Waluyati, S. A. (2017). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn di Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Palembang. Jurnal Bhineka Tunggal Ika, 4(1), 101-113.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v2i2.865

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Didactic Mathematics

Mahesa Research Center