Email this article Enhancing students’ mathematical literacy ability through the implementation of the Needham learning model assisted by GeoGebra
(1) Institut Sains dan Bisnis Internasional Singkawang
(2) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of limited learning models, conventional instructional methods, and minimal utilization of interactive technology on low mathematical literacy. It highlights a research gap in integrating the Needham model with GeoGebra for teaching linear equations. The study’s objective was to compare the mathematical literacy improvement of students taught with the Needham model supported by GeoGebra versus those receiving conventional instruction. Additionally, it aimed to assess the implementation of the Needham model assisted by GeoGebra. A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent pretest–posttest control group was employed. The study’s population comprised 124 eighth-grade students at State Junior High School 8 Singkawang. Purposive sampling was used to select class VIII A (25 students) as the experimental group and class VIII B (25 students) as the control group. Data analysis techniques utilized included normalized gain, t-test, and implementation percentage. The results revealed that the experimental group (N-Gain = 0.65) outperformed the control group (0.32), demonstrating a statistically significant difference (tcount = 3.243 > ttable = 2.01, p < 0.05). This indicates that students taught with the Needham model supported by GeoGebra exhibited greater improvement in mathematical literacy compared to those taught with conventional methods. The implementation of the Needham model assisted by GeoGebra was categorized as very good, exceeding the 90% threshold. Specifically, 92.37% of students achieved the desired level in the first session and 96.85% in the second session. The study concludes that the Needham model assisted by GeoGebra significantly enhances students’ mathematical literacy in learning systems of linear equations in two variables.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Farida, R. N., Qohar, A., & Rahardjo, S. (2021). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa SMA kelas X dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe PISA konten change and relationship. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2802–2815. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.972
Fitriani, N. A., Darta, D., & Kandaga, T. (2023). Penerapan model problem based learning berbantuan GeoGebra untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematis siswa SMA. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 8(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v8i1.8480
Gardenia, N. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman dan komunikasi matematis siswa SMK melalui pembelajaran konstruktivisme model Needham. Jurnal Formatif, 6(2), 110–118.
Handayani, R., Refiasari, M., & Meilasari, V. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Needham terhadap pemahaman konsep trigonometri. Eksponen, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47637/eksponen.v13i1.774
Khotimah, K. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan literasi matematis dengan pendekatan metacognitive guidance berbantuan GeoGebra. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v1i1.636
Kurniawan, R., & Djidu, H. (2021). Kemampuan literasi matematis siswa: Sebuah studi literatur. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.21137/edumatic.v2i01.468
Kurniawan, D., & Anwar, Y. (2022). Pengembangan modul ajar matematika berbasis literasi matematis untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.3890
Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Herman, T. (2020). The application of GeoGebra in teaching quadratic functions: How effective is it? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), Article 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012070
Lestari, H. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian pendidikan matematika. Refika Aditama.
Lestari, H. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Penelitian pendidikan matematika (Cetakan ke-2). Refika Aditama.
Lestari, H. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2018). Penelitian pendidikan matematika (Cetakan ke-3). Refika Aditama.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Needham, R., & Hill, P. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Puspita, R., Nugroho, S. E., & Pramuditya, S. R. (2022). The effect of GeoGebra-assisted problem-based learning model on students’ mathematical literacy ability. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15232a
Rahmawati, N., Wulandari, D., & Saputra, A. (2023). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis masalah di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 8(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v8i1.4567
Ramadhani, A., Hasyim, N., & Jamaluddin. (2024). Effectiveness of using demonstration learning method for grade X students in archiving subject at SMK Nurul Qalam Makassar. Journal of Educational Development and Learning, 1(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.70188/6t09k943
Safitri, M. R., Rofiah, N., & Arifah, S. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran konstruktivisme berbasis GeoGebra untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. Jurnal Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.31000/jppm.v5i2.4009
Siregar, E. (2017). Statistika deskriptif untuk penelitian pendidikan. Prenadamedia Group.
Siregar, T. M., Manurung, N., Zega, N., Banjarnahor, T. A., Siregar, S. S. D., & Anindya, Z. (2024). Studi literatur: GeoGebra sebagai media pembelajaran pada materi SPLDV. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 44806–44811. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/21318
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-2). Alfabeta.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Widyawati, S., Putra, F. G., Bistari, B., & Hamdani, H. (2023). The effect of GeoGebra-assisted learning cycle 7E model and cognitive style on the mathematical concepts understanding ability. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 1(1). https://indomath.org/index.php/indomath/article/view/7
Yuliana, D., Maryono, M., & Amalia, R. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan GeoGebra terhadap kemampuan berpikir matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 8(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v8i2.30134
Zhang, H., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2023). Integrating mathematical literacy indicators into teaching materials: Effects on students’ problem-solving and communication skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(4), 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2181254
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v7i1.2726
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Mahesa Research Center
