Application of SPSS software in learning multivariate statistical methods courses for mathematics education students

Afifah Latip Rasyid Jauhari(1), Riva Lesta Ariany(2), Anwar Sadat(3),


(1) Universitas Mandiri, Subang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 41211
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 40614
(3) Universitas Mandiri, Subang, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 41211

Abstract


This study investigates the implementation of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) in teaching a Multivariate Statistics course and elucidates students’ learning outcomes following participation in SPSS-assisted instruction. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed, focusing on students’ conceptual comprehension, proficiency in operating SPSS, and capacity to interpret multivariate statistical outputs. The participants were undergraduate Mathematics Education students selected through purposive sampling, comprising 28 students from a single class. Data were collected utilizing learning outcome tests, performance assessment rubrics, and student response questionnaires, and were analyzed employing descriptive statistics, encompassing mean scores, standard deviations, and percentage distributions. The findings indicate that students’ learning outcomes are generally categorized as favorable (mean = 78.46), with a relatively homogeneous score distribution (SD = 6.87). In terms of skills, students exhibited stronger abilities in data input and processing (80.12) and selecting appropriate analysis techniques (77.85), while their capacity to interpret statistical outputs was relatively lower (75.63). Student responses toward SPSS-assisted learning were also positive, with 88% indicating its relevance to academic needs, 85% asserting that it supports conceptual understanding, 82% perceiving it as user-friendly, and 80% reporting enhanced learning interest. Overall, the findings demonstrate that students exhibit favorable learning outcomes, practical skills in utilizing SPSS, and positive perceptions toward its use in learning. However, since this study employed a descriptive design devoid of a comparison group, the results should be interpreted cautiously and cannot be utilized to infer causal relationships.

Keywords


Multivariate statistics; SPSS; mathematics education; statistical literacy; higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, R. B. (2021). Assessment dan evaluasi pembelajaran matematika di perguruan tinggi. Deepublish.

Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Brookhart, S. M. (2021). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Chan, J. Y.-C., Closser, A. H., Ngo, V., Smith, H., Liu, A. S., & Ottmar, E. (2023). Examining shifts in conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge and procedural flexibility in the context of two game-based technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4), 1274–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12798

Engel, J., Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., Podworny, S., Schiller, A., & Martignon, L. (2019). Zivilstatistik: Konzept einer neuen Perspektive auf data literacy und statistical literacy. AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, 13, 213–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-019-00260-w

Field, A. (2021). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Garfield, J., Ben-Zvi, D., Chance, B., Medina, E., Roseth, C., & Zieffler, A. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8383-9

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12.

Kallivokas, D. (2023). Teaching basic statistic concepts to student classes with diverse mathematical background using specialized applets. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 801–804. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.007

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2021). Adding it up: Helping students learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Hong, J. I. (2020). Students’ academic use of mobile technology and higher-order thinking skills: The role of active engagement. Education Sciences, 10(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030047

Kismiantini, K., Ratnasari, A. P., & Nur’aini, R. (2025). Pelatihan analisis data pendidikan dan ilmu sosial dengan program JASP. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA, 9(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpmmp.v9i2.83501

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355

Otaya, L. G. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan aplikasi SPSS terhadap pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan mahasiswa mengolah data statistik. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 87–101.

Pallant, J. (2021). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y

Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65, 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264

Retnawati, H. (2021). Penilaian pembelajaran matematika. UNY Press.

Schunk, D. H. (2021). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Subali, B., Negoro, R. A., Ellianawati, Dwijananti, P., Anandita, A. S., Setyaningsih, N. E., & Siswanto. (2025). Technology-enhanced learning for statistical graph interpretation: An item response theory analysis of learning outcomes. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 11(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v11i2.89666

Suryati, K., & Krisna, E. D. (2023). Efektivitas penerapan pembelajaran statistika berbantuan aplikasi SPSS terhadap hasil belajar mahasiswa. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 14(4), 447–455. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/paedagoria/article/view/17133

Syafriani, D. (2021). Pembelajaran statistika dengan metode tutorial menggunakan aplikasi SPSS untuk meningkatkan kemampuan statistik mahasiswa. JS (Jurnal Sekolah), 5(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.24114/js.v5i2.26302

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2021). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v2i2.553

Widoyoko, E. P. (2020). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., Alt, S., Dupuis, D., Holleque, K., & Chang, B. (2008). What does research suggest about the teaching and learning of introductory statistics at the college level? A review of the literature. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2008.11889566




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v7i1.3012

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Didactic Mathematics

Mahesa Research Center